Flies without Trehalose

Living organisms adapt to environmental changes through metabolic homeostasis. Sugars are used primarily for the metabolic production of ATP energy and carbon sources. Trehalose is a nonreducing disaccharide that is present in many organisms. In insects, the principal hemolymph sugar is trehalose instead of glucose. As in mammals, hemolymph sugar levels in Drosophila are regulated by the action of endocrine hormones. Therefore, the mobilization of trehalose to glucose is thought to be critical for metabolic homeostasis. However, the physiological role of trehalose as a hemolymph sugar during insect development remains largely unclear. Here, we demonstrate that mutants of the trehalose-synthesizing enzyme Tps1 failed to produce trehalose as expected but survived into the late pupal period and died before eclosion. Larvae without trehalose grew normally, with a slight reduction in body size, under normal food conditions. However, these larvae were extremely sensitive to starvation, possibly due to a local defect in the central nervous system. Furthermore, Tps1 mutant larvae failed to grow on a low-sugar diet and exhibited severe growth defects on a low-protein diet. These diet-dependent phenotypes of Tps1 mutants demonstrate the critical role of trehalose during development in Drosophila and reveal how animals adapt to changes in nutrient availability.     

KNOCKDOWN OF ATPsyn‐b CAUSED LARVAL GROWTH DEFECT AND MALE INFERTILITY IN Drosophila

The ATPsyn‐b encoding for subunit b of ATP synthase in Drosophila melanogaster is proposed to act in ATP synthesis and phagocytosis, and has been identified as one of the sperm proteins in both Drosophila and mammals. At present, its details of functions in animal growth and spermatogenesis have not been reported. In this study, we knocked down ATPsyn‐b using Drosophila lines expressing inducible hairpin RNAi constructs and Gal4 drivers. Ubiquitous knockdown of ATPsyn‐b resulted in growth defects in larval stage as the larvae did not grow bigger than the size of normal second‐instar larvae. Knockdown in testes did not interrupt the developmental excursion to viable adult flies, however, these male adults were sterile. Analyses of testes revealed disrupted nuclear bundles during spermatogenesis and abnormal shaping in spermatid elongation. There were no mature sperm in the seminal vesicle of ATPsyn‐b knockdown male testes. These findings suggest us that ATPsyn‐b acts in growth and male fertility of Drosophila.     

THE GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE GENETIC BASIS OF RESISTANCE TO WASP PARASITISM IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

There have been very few genetic analyses of “natural” adaptations, that is, those not involving artificial selection or responses to human disturbance. Here we analyze the genetic basis of geographic variation in Drosophila melanogaster's resistance to parasitism by a wasp, Asobara tabida. Our results suggest that population differences in ability to encapsulate parasitoid eggs have a fairly simple genetic basis: 60% of the D. melanogaster genome plays no role in differences between resistant and susceptible populations. Instead, resistance gene(s) are restricted to chromosome two, and may be further restricted to the centromeric region of this chromosome. This finding suggests that natural adaptations—like many responses to artificial selection and human disturbance—sometimes have a simple genetic basis.     

The impacts of cytoplasmic incompatibility factor (cifA and cifB) genetic variation on phenotypes

Wolbachia are maternally transmitted, intracellular bacteria that can often selfishly spread through arthropod populations via cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). CI manifests as embryonic death when males expressing prophage WO genes cifA and cifB mate with uninfected females or females harboring an incompatible Wolbachia strain. Females with a compatible cifA-expressing strain rescue CI. Thus, cif-mediated CI confers a relative fitness advantage to females transmitting Wolbachia. However, whether cif sequence variation underpins incompatibilities between Wolbachia strains and variation in CI penetrance remains unknown. Here, we engineer Drosophila melanogaster to transgenically express cognate and non-cognate cif homologs and assess their CI and rescue capability. Cognate expression revealed that cifA;B native to D. melanogaster causes strong CI, and cognate cifA;B homologs from two other Drosophila-associated Wolbachia cause weak transgenic CI, including the first demonstration of phylogenetic type 2 cifA;B CI. Intriguingly, non-cognate expression of cifA and cifB alleles from different strains revealed that cifA homologs generally contribute to strong transgenic CI and interchangeable rescue despite their evolutionary divergence, and cifB genetic divergence contributes to weak or no transgenic CI. Finally, we find that a type 1 cifA can rescue CI caused by a genetically divergent type 2 cifA;B in a manner consistent with unidirectional incompatibility. By genetically dissecting individual CI functions for type 1 and 2 cifA and cifB, this work illuminates new relationships between cif genotype and CI phenotype. We discuss the relevance of these findings to CI’s genetic basis, phenotypic variation patterns, and mechanism.     

Interspecific competition in Drosophila II. Competitive outcome in some 2–resource environments

Populations of Drosophila metanogaster and D. simulans were made to compete in a number of 2– resource environments. The resources used were all based on a standard Drosophila medium and differed from each other only in their concentrations of ethanol. Each experiment comprised three cages started at a species–frequency of 0.8 D. melanogaster and three at 0.2 D. melanogaster. This enabled screening for a wide range of equilibria.
Reversal of competitive superiority was achieved (unintentionally) by raising the alcohol level of one of the resources. Thus while D. simulans won in an environment with media containing 0 and 896 ethanol, D. melanogaster won if the ethanol concentrations were 0 and 10%, or 0 and 12%. This parallels the reversal of dominance reported earlier for single–resource systems. However, in none of the 2–resource systems studied was there a stable equilibrium in species–frequency–in fact there was no significant frequency–dependence at all.
An artificial selection experiment produced a stock of D. melanogaster ovipositing a higher proportion of eggs on the alcoholic resource. Thus, this stock was more divergent from D. simulans , in at least one aspect of resource use, than was the original stock of D. melanogaster. However, competition between stock D. simulans and selected D. melanogaster showed no frequency–dependence. Again, reversal of competitive dominance was unintentionally achieved.
The implications of these results are discussed, and the need for a comprehensive study of resource–utilization in a pair of competing species is stressed.     

Spatiotemporally modulated Vestigial gradient by Wingless signaling adaptively regulates cell division for precise wing size control

In animal development, the growth of a tissue or organ is timely arrested when it reaches the stereotyped correct size. How this is robustly controlled remains poorly understood. The prevalent viewpoint, which is that morphogen gradients, due to their organizing roles in development, are directly responsible for growth arrest, cannot explain a number of observations. Recent findings from studies of the Drosophila wing have revealed that the interpretation of the Wingless gradient requires signaling-induced self-inhibition and that cell proliferation is controlled by graded vestigial expression. These findings highlight a growth control mechanism that involves Wingless regulated vestigial expression, but a question is whether they can quantitatively explain the observed preciseness and robustness of wing size control. Quantitative and systematic investigation into Wingless signaling using a mathematical model has elucidated two points. First, negative regulation of the Vestigial gradient by Wingless signaling makes vestigial expression precise and robust. Second, weak Wingless signaling in a primarily small wing pouch causes a short and steep Vestigial gradient, which stimulates more cell divisions and leads to a significant expansion of the wing pouch; however, strong Wingless signaling in a primarily large wing pouch causes a long and smooth Vestigial gradient, which stimulates fewer cell divisions and results in a slight expansion of the wing pouch. These results substantially decipher an inherent mechanism of tissue and organ size control. Our model explains, and is supported by, a number of experimental observations.     

Tubby-tagged balancers for the Drosophila X and second chromosomes

We generated FM7a and CyO balancer chromosomes bearing a Tubby¹ (Tb¹) dominant transgene. Flies heterozygous for these FM7a and CyO derivatives exhibit a phenotype undistinguishable from that elicited by the Tb¹ mutation associated with the TM6B balancer. We tested two of these Tb-bearing balancers (FM7-TbA and CyO-TbA) for more than 30 generations and found that the Tb¹ transgene they carry is stable. Thus, these new Tb-tagged balancers are particularly useful for balancing lethal mutations and distinguish homozygous mutant larvae from their heterozygous siblings.     

Isolation of Drosophila melanogaster Testes

The testes of Drosophila melanogaster provide an important model for the study of stem cell maintenance and differentiation, meiosis, and soma-germline interactions. Testes are typically isolated from adult males 0-3 days after eclosion from the pupal case. The testes of wild-type flies are easily distinguished from other tissues because they are yellow, but the testes of white mutant flies, a common genetic background for laboratory experiments are similar in both shape and color to the fly gut. Performing dissection on a glass microscope slide with a black background makes identifying the testes considerably easier. Testes are removed from the flies using dissecting needles. Compared to protocols that use forceps for testes dissection, our method is far quicker, allowing a well-practiced individual to dissect testes from 200-300 wild-type flies per hour, yielding 400-600 testes. Testes from white flies or from mutants that reduce testes size are harder to dissect and typically yield 200-400 testes per hour.     

Live-cell Imaging of Sensory Organ Precursor Cells in Intact Drosophila Pupae

Since the discovery of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), there has been a revolutionary change in the use of live-cell imaging as a tool for understanding fundamental biological mechanisms. Striking progress has been particularly evident in Drosophila, whose extensive toolkit of mutants and transgenic lines provides a convenient model to study evolutionarily-conserved developmental and cell biological mechanisms. We are interested in understanding the mechanisms that control cell fate specification in the adult peripheral nervous system (PNS) in Drosophila. Bristles that cover the head, thorax, abdomen, legs and wings of the adult fly are individual mechanosensory organs, and have been studied as a model system for understanding mechanisms of Notch-dependent cell fate decisions. Sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells of the microchaetes (or small bristles), are distributed throughout the epithelium of the pupal thorax, and are specified during the first 12 hours after the onset of pupariation. After specification, the SOP cells begin to divide, segregating the cell fate determinant Numb to one daughter cell during mitosis. Numb functions as a cell-autonomous inhibitor of the Notch signaling pathway.Here, we show a method to follow protein dynamics in SOP cell and its progeny within the intact pupal thorax using a combination of tissue-specific Gal4 drivers and GFP-tagged fusion proteins ^1,2.This technique has the advantage over fixed tissue or cultured explants because it allows us to follow the entire development of an organ from specification of the neural precursor to growth and terminal differentiation of the organ. We can therefore directly correlate changes in cell behavior to changes in terminal differentiation. Moreover, we can combine the live imaging technique with mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) system to assess the dynamics of tagged proteins in mitotic SOPs under mutant or wildtype conditions. Using this technique, we and others have revealed novel insights into regulation of asymmetric cell division and the control of Notch signaling activation in SOP cells (examples include references ^{1-6,7 ,8}).